Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar
Date: Nov 06, 2001 @ 00:28
Author: Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


106. I had another look at all my sources, and I am now positive that 4
small enclaves I had previously are actually 4 "chhits" making up one single
enclave. Thus the total has dropped by three.
The numbers on Banerji's map are: 28, 29,30 & 31.

BW


>From: "m donner" <maxivan82@...>
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar
>Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 21:38:36 +0000
>
>i seem to recall 109 too
>
>so if he doesnt answer
>dont stop the presses on my account
>
>it is too expensive
>
>& so hard to publish these days
>isnt it
>
>m
>
>
> >From: "Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>
> >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Cooch Behar
> >Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 18:07:05 -0000
> >
> >Brendan:
> > > The 106 Indian exclaves/counterexclaves/countercounterexclave ...
> >
> >Hmm. Last time we were in contact, you put the total at 109: 105
> >exclaves, 3 counterexclaves, 1 countercounterexclave.
> >Has something changed, or has your research progressed?
> >(My enclave article is probably just about to hit press, so I'm keen
> >to fire off a revision if necessary.)
> >
> >Grant
> >
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp