Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Capitals of higher level are not capitals of lower level
Date: Oct 03, 2001 @ 22:54
Author: Asher Samuels (Asher Samuels <asher972@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


I stand corrected on Providence, Rhode Island. In the
future I'll check more accurate maps before posting.


--- m donner <maxivan82@...> wrote:
> i would agree capitals of higher level are not
> necessarily nor usually
> capitals of lower level
> & i dont honestly know
> but i bet we could find a capital of higher level
> that is also a capital of
> lower level
> like say a state capital city that is also a county
> seat
>
> m
>
> in fact didnt tallahassee just become famous for
> being simultaneously the
> state capital of florida & the seat of leon county
>
> i think so
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>
> >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Capitals of higher level
> are not capitals of lower
> >level
> >Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 09:23:04 -0000
> >
> >The title of this mail is probably not very clear
> to all, but what I
> >mean is the following: Amsterdam is the capital of
> the Netherlands,
> >but is _not_ the capital of the province it's in
> (North Holland);
> >this is Haarlem.
> >
> >The capital of the Spanish region of Extremadura is
> Merida, but this
> >town is in the province of Badajoz, of which the
> city with that name
> >is the capital.
> >
> >Are there other examples like that?
> >
> >Peter S.
> >
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1