Subject: Re: Quick GIS list of MultiCountry points
Date: Aug 08, 2000 @ 14:50
Author: michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


from david offlist

still i think this is very good news to share

>the "machine" (geographic information system) would do this easily for any
>set of regions/polygons, given the data. And there is the trick. Free
>data is generally only available for the world of nation-states, and for
>the United States. Most other governments copyright their data and charge
>fairly high fees for it. So, it would be fairly easy to do US States, or
>all the US multi-county points (probably around 6000-7000?).
>
>The oceans are a different matter, it seems to be the tradition to
>terminate national and state boundaries at the shore in these datasets,
>and to leave the oceans as one big polygon. There are probably 'law of
>the sea" databases somewhere that do divide the ocean and even the three
>mile limits and 3 league limits but I do not know about them.
>
>David

ok
beautiful
here is the question then

ignoring 3mile & 3league data in this case
because they are irrelevant in this case
& including los or law of the sea databases
because i think they may well be the whole picture & nothing but the
picture in this case
how would i begin to search for this single los attachment

& if i find it could i then hook it up to the vacuum cleaner

m





as for the multisubdivisional points
i am content to leave these for future generations of enthusiasts
hahaha

except perhaps for the megapoints & maxipoint

so i am also curious in this area
what do you & we all think about the relative weights of the points

like for example
am i right or mistaken in my belief that the tri country list is
objectively paramount & in fact the world class
or isnt a quadripoint somehow more significant than its tripoint siblings
or arent twins & triplets etc just plain more than the ordinary singletons
etc
etc

not expecting answers in this area necessarily
but any musings would be most welcome



>
>On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, michael donner wrote:
>
>> i am seeing this dream machine of yours works equally well on both dry &
>> wet points
>> like
>> rivers
>> lakes
>> no problem
>> & wondering whether it vacuums in salt water as well
>>
>> also whether it could be programmed to suck up all such points out of any
>> given subregion or sub subregion etc
>> & thus ultimately out of the entire world
>>
>> muffled m@d laughter in background
>>
>> but both serious questions
>>
>> m
>>
>>
>>