Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] continued haply ever after<br/>
Date: Aug 06, 2000 @ 21:19<br/>
Author: David Mark (David Mark &lt;dmark@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="302.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="304.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic284.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="302.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="304.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-134406139">On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, michael donner wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; say<br/>
&gt; what is your opinion if any of the major canadian domestic points<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; like do you acknowledge the 4 corners of the north as anything<br/>
&gt; or any federal territories<br/>
&gt; or what<br/>
&gt; etc<br/>
&gt; etc<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Sticking to my &quot;same level&quot; principle, the only tri-Province points that<br/>
Canada may have are wet ones in the Gulf of St. Lawrence or the Cabot<br/>
Strait. And no tri-territory points. But there are some tripple points<br/>
including 1 or 2 provinces and 1 or 2 territories. And a genuine quad<br/>
point for Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nunavut, and Northwest Territories,<br/>
where the 102 W meridian crosses the 60th parallel. (see<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://npc.nunavut.ca/eng/nunavut/boundary.html)">http://npc.nunavut.ca/eng/nunavut/boundary.html)</a><br/>
<br/>
David</div>