Subject: Re: about the nmoktx flap
Date: Jun 18, 2001 @ 00:26
Author: bjbutler@bjbsoftware.com (bjbutler@...)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Mike, how far is the stone's throw nwn?
BJB

--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., bjbutler@b... wrote:
> Hahaha. And away we go!
> BJB
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., David Mark <dmark@g...> wrote:
> >
> > Michael, are you REALLY claiming that the monument in
> > http://www.bjbsoftware.com/corners/photos/NMOKTXJane.jpg
> > is not the same as the monument in
> > http://www.geog.buffalo.edu/~dmark/tristate/NMOKTX02.jpg
> > ??
> > Sure look the same to me!!
> >
> > What does the REAL monument look like??
> >
> > David
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Michael Donner wrote:
> >
> > > & i am happy to report about the great nmoktx controversy that
> everybody is
> > > at least partly & most everyone entirely right
> > >
> > > & the only clarification still needed there is that janes
> pseudonmoktx
> > > monument is actually just a stones throw wnw into new mexico
from
> king jacks
> > > true nmoktx
> > > & therefore of davids & brians etc etc
> > >
> > > i hadnt met jack or even a topo when jane & i blew it there
> > > & had to jump out of the way of that cow stampede
> > >
> > > david was reasoning assumptively that janes
> > > which looks like jacks
> > > must have been jacks
> > >
> > > but now everyone realizes a bit more poignantly what we
ourselves
> only just
> > > discovered earlier this month as we blew thru there on our
review
> visit
> > >
> > > there are several others like this at that old picture site
brian
> > > so you may want to flash it all again & take this already
playful
> > > opportunity to weed them out
> > > or shucks please find & highlight the errors if you would
> > >
> > > anyway
> > > gotta go before i time out
> > >
> > > m