Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: global clave census in progress<br/>
Date: May 10, 2001 @ 05:52<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="2376.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic2359.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="2376.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2378.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1577794923">martin was saying<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;the entire<br/>
&gt;Strait of Gibraltar is territorial sea (in theory delimited by median<br/>
&gt;lines pending boundary agreements between the littoral states)<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>& this is the only peg we have to hang our analytic hat on in this area<br/>
but it ought to be sufficient<br/>
both for this area & generally<br/>
tho not everywhere<br/>
as the following counterexample shows<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;With regard to pockets of high seas surrounded by the territorial sea of<br/>
&gt;a single country, there is one in the western Aegean to the south of<br/>
&gt;Euboea. However, it only exists because Greece only claims a 6 nautical<br/>
&gt;mile territorial sea; if it ever claims a 12 nm territorial sea, the<br/>
&gt;&#39;enclave&#39; would disappear. Whether others would appear elsewhere in the<br/>
&gt;Aegean as a result would probably depend on the outcome of the<br/>
&gt;Greek-Turkish war that would likely follow such an extension....<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>here our entire hat rack falls over<br/>
because the global consensus is so clearly trumped by this local one<br/>
<br/>
such examples must affect the claves & their counts<br/>
& they will have to be looked after individually<br/>
anywhere there is a local variance from the 12nm standard<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
i was under the impression there might be more pockets of high seas in the<br/>
aegean than just this 1 near euboea tho</div>