the iso diglyph list is looking pretty good at
http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/codlstp1/en_listp1.html
& i would have just moved forward right away & adopted it out of hand
except for a few drawbacks i have just realized it holds for me
1
it has a substantially lower vowel to consonant ratio than the fips list
& since these mostly 6 & 8letter names i am creating need to be utterable
& since the iso vowel shortfall should square or cube the difficulty of iso
pronunciation
well that is a real setback
for example the lovely & even sort of african sounding bcwazazi of fips
becomes the bwnazmzw point in iso
happily this orthographic disaster could be pronounced
bwanas zoom zoo or bwanas mzoo
pertinent & memorable observations for that particular locale
but the real deficit is that bwnazmzw & the iso names as a class are bound
to look & feel far more unspeakable & forbidding than the fips
2
i would have to undo a lot of stuff already done & possibly also ask brian
to revamp our multinational section at the corner corner
all which is based on fips
3
it seems as tho the fips roster is less fickle than the iso
so a fips based naming system promises to be easier to maintain
4
etc
hmmm
but wait
why not simply make no basic changes & yet adopt both systems
would that be so confusing
as indexers we are almost bound to do it anyway
& we will be forgiven for seeming too anglo or yankocentric when it is
realized that the game was hatched & developed in north america as was
inevitable where cool tripoints are so rampant & easy
just thinking out loud while inviting your thought before proceeding
m