Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: how many countries in the world
Date: Apr 30, 2001 @ 01:46
Author: michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>
>Michael:
>> 168 the lowest answer given by anyone tho unexplained
>> 170 number of currencies
>> 172 countries recognized by russia
>> 189 members of u n & thus upu
>> 190 number given by info please kids almanac
>> 191 recognized by uk
>>
>> 192 most popular refs as detailed above
>>
>> 194 recognized by switzerland
>> 200 plus recognized by germany
>> 239 iso diglyphs
>> 266 or so the highest including all dependencies etc
>
>I was surprised to see the UK (my native soil) credited with only 191
>in this list. I checked out the link on the "Countries by Heart" site
>you mention, and it does nothing to support this particular count.
>The linked site is a Foreign and Commonwealth Office list of Overseas
>Missions. As well as a few British Overseas Territories like the
>Turks and Caicos, it lists 187 countries. Missing are Afghanistan,
>Bhutan, Central African Republic, Iraq and North Korea. As far as I'm
>aware the U.K. recognises all of these, we just don't happen to have
>embassy staff on site, for various reasons.
>Similarly, the 200+ German-recognised countries don't seem to be
>borne out by the German site. The same old 192 countries are there,
>plus a host of dependencies like Midway Island that I don't think
>anyone would wish to promote as independent states!
>So the debate still comes down to the well-recognised marginals like
>Palestine, Tibet, North Cyprus and S.M.O.M., and the "pendings" like
>Nagorno-Karabakh, Western Sahara and East Timor.
>I wrote an article about the country-count once, and found the main
>problem to be the dependencies. There are isolated territories like
>the Azores and Canaries that are treated as integral parts of the
>parent countries. And there are places like the French Overseas
>Departments that could be considered part of the parent country, but
>which also run a limited self-government in parallel with the
>administrative structure of the parent country. At the other end of
>the scale, do we count Jan Mayen as a dependency separate from
>Svalbard? It is administered from Svalbard, but the practical day-to-
>day administration is done by the local military commander. What
>about territories with only rotating scientific and military staff,
>like South Georgia? What about isolated spots of coral and guano with
>no permanent habitation at all, like Howland Island or Clipperton
>Island? What about territories south of 60 deg S, covered by the
>Antarctic Treaty? What about territories that are half-covered by the
>Antarctic Treaty, like the French Southern and Antarctic Territories?
>At the time, after a hell of a lot of discussion, I came up with 42
>inhabited dependencies (with a permanent civilian population) and
>18 "uninhabited" dependencies (including those with only
>military/scientific staff). Since then I've bumped the inhabited
>total to 43, because the Finnish Aland islands seem to have as much
>autonomy as many other places I'd listed.
>(The original article appeared in the August/September 1999 edition
>of "Wanderlust" magazine, if you're interested.)
>
>Grant
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=190481.1393724.2979175.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700126166:N/A=55
>0983/?http://www.newaydirect.com target="_top"> Your use of Yahoo!
>Groups is subject to the <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Yahoo! Terms
>of Service.