Did I think you were complaining? Yes, and in a most belittling way.
I also thought, rightly so, that you were once again demonstrating
your lack of people skills - your inability to perceive what things
you write generally sound like to others as evidenced by the retreats
that come every time you are called on something. Straighten up and
have a care.
LN
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>
wrote:
>
> hahaha
> but did you think i was complaining
> hahahaha
>
> on the contrary len
>
> it is you who are complaining
> of my atrocity
> hahahahaha
> as well as not paying attention
> as you freely admit
> & so no problem
>
>
> all i am commenting on here below & again now is how
> far off target you obviously are in offering this
> posting to boundarypoint
>
> & understandably so
> in view of your proud disregard for our actual topic
>
> & i have no complaint with that
> nor with you
> nor with your doing that or being that way here
> nor with your being here
>
> in fact i couldnt be happier here
> with you or without you
> on target or off
>
> indeed
> just being in such a fine & pointy place makes me
> independently happy
> as i see it does for many others too
>
> perhaps even for you sometimes
>
>
> so please do be as disregardful as you like
>
> for it really doesnt matter
>
>
>
> & yet
> at the same time
> when you are so off target in a place expressly
> devoted to taking fine aim at a clearly stated & very
> fine & very rare & very special objective
> & to then evaluating the relative success of such fine
> tries
> you may & probably should expect some correspondingly
> fine feedback to that effect
>
> for there really is a point to boundarypoint
> i assure you
>
> & you can certainly deny it & or try to blunt it & or
> complain about it
> or about the way someone else relates to it or to you
>
> but that doesnt make it go away or become less fine
>
> for this fineness & specialness is all we have really
> agreed to by being here together
>
> we have agreed we are interested in a special category
> of fine targets
>
> the multipoints
>
> & we take aim at & evaluate our successes at hitting
> these targets
>
> & there is no complaint when someone misses or even
> slobbers
>
> not even when they miss so hideously as you almost
> always seem to do
>
> but it still does give rise to the usual evaluations &
> causes a bit more hilarity than usual in some cases
>
> so rest assured you are enormously entertaining
> to me at least
> whether you mean to be entertaining or multipointing
> or not
>
> --- "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...> wrote:
>
> > I'm rarely confused and almost never lost. I'm
> > always "disregardful"
> > of everything contained in your atrocious wordiness,
> > however, so you
> > might consider saving on capital letters with
> > someone else. If anyone
> > else were to complain, then I'd pay attention. But
> > for you, if you
> > don't like my presence, you know where the
> > deregister button is.
> >
> > LN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> > <aletheiak@> wrote:
> > >
> > > yikes but are you sure you just came back in to
> > the right place len
> > >
> > > for i think you may either be confused about or
> > disregardful of our
> > topic & us again
> > > seeing as boundarypoint is actually devoted to
> > multipointing
> > > rather than abandoned harbor leases or any of the
> > other topics you
> > are again describing
> > > here
> > >
> > > & our actual group description
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
> > > has always made this focus of ours quite clear
> > > & still does
> > > it seems to me
> > > even tho it has often been innocently overlooked
> > > as well as deliberately ignored
> > >
> > > & the extrinsic subjects you keep bringing back
> > here may well have
> > been addressed here
> > > at one time & may very well have been left unended
> > here too
> > >
> > > but that is because they were misdirected here in
> > the first place
> > > & are still misdirected here when they return
> > >
> > > i hope you do find your way to wherever you
> > thought you were & think
> > you are or meant to
> > > go tho
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A.
> > Nadybal" <lnadybal@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I just came in to report on a subject previously
> > addressed here that
> > > > was left un-ended. Those of you who remember
> > Wolfgang Schaub might be
> > > > happy to hear he never let loose on the topic
> > and secured and
> > > > translated the polish text of the treaty between
> > CZ and PL on the
> > > > harbor lease. It lasted only about 12 years
> > from 1947, after which
> > > > the Czechs abandoned it. The area was comprised
> > of a particular dock
> > > > and adjacent land in the duty free portion of
> > the harbor, and the
> > > > treaty contained provisions allowing the Czechs
> > to further occupy a
> > > > separate exclave a short distance from the main
> > portion. The treaty
> > > > actually states that the area would be called
> > (from Polish to German
> > > > to half English), Czechoslavakian "Gebiet"(a
> > word discused here
> > > > earlier, too) in the Customs Excluded Territory
> > of Stettin Harbor (or
> > > > similar).
> > > >
> > > > A news article from the time, which he also
> > found and translated,
> > > > reveals that Czechoslovakia never was able to
> > secure the rights in
> > > > Stettin from the Germans that were accorded to
> > it in the Versailles
> > > > Treaty after World War I.
> > > >
> > > > Regards to all
> > > >
> > > > Len Nadybal
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>