have been laughing especially at this part of our misunderstanding
much of the way from surprise to superior
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
<mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> I have trimmed my replies, not to cover any tracks, but because
several members
> have asked posters to do so. It's all there in the archives
anyway. If I
> really wanted to hide a past post, I could delete it from the
archives.
for of course when i said
even as you progressively cover your tracks by cutting the texts
i didnt mean i thought you were deliberately covering up here
but only that your cuts had had the effect of making the very sources
you were apparently presuming from & that i therefore increasingly
needed to double check all the less accessible to me
thus covering your tracks in that circumstantial sense only
& not deliberately covering up
as you chose to understand me
presumably in jest yourself
or at least that is my provisional happy ending
because i cant believe you really felt chastised at all by what i
actually meant & said
let alone severely so