Subject: Re: alethejak
Date: Dec 22, 2004 @ 17:31
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>your humble venture in saying this is actually producing an untruth
> Dear Mike,
>
> > > I usually don't complain
> > > about off-topic
> >
> > good because theres really no topic here at bp my friend
> >
> > we only used to have a topic
> > & it was multipointing
> >
> > indeed we used to be a multipointing society
> >
> > but by popular demand
> > & because we are still everyones land
> > we are now anything anyone likes
> > & we talk about anything you or anyone else likes
>
> Well, in my humble opinion this has to be differentiated a bit. I
> think most people - I would venture to say, the overwhelming
> majority, i.e. everybody but you - would like to allow discussions
> about other aspects of boundaries, as well.
> multipoints. I do not see why we can't include discussions aboutthere is no reason why you cant include whatever you like besides
> enclaves, unusual boundaries, microstates et al. This obviously
> should not mean that we have no topic at all.
> > & if you mean to say you dont like this discussionconversations
> > or anything else for that matter
> > then just skip it
> >
> > thats right
> > quit reading it
> > a n d
> > dont mention it
> > because
> > what you dont like is definitely off topic here at bp
> >
> > & off taste as well
> >
> > by which you can know it
>
> Well, I think there is a difference between off-topic
> and those on illegal issues, that's all I wanted to state. If thisexactly
> strange conversation with Herr/Frau "deutsche_kilr" had continued,
> who knows where it would have lead?
> I do not want to know about suchthen why create it
> activity, as this would make me ipso facto complicit which I
> obviously want to avoid.
>funny how communication breaks down at the most interesting points
>
> > > conversations and regard
> > > more or less everything having to do with boundaries and
> > territorial
> > > questions as admissible for this list (not just multipoints).
> >
> > your sensibilities are acknowledged & appreciated
> >
> > but if you mean to admit the overwhelming majority of boundary &
> > territorial questions
> > which originate in & perpetuate various aspects of human
> wretchedness
> > as a few members sometimes apparently do
> > then i would like to know why you would like that
>
> I do not understand this question, please use clearer English!
> Proper punctuation often helps, by the way.
>else,
> > > But I think conversations about smuggling narcotics between
> > different
> > > jurisdictions should - if at all - best be taken somewhere
> > > unless we want our e-mails checked by the FBI.need
> >
> > but couldnt you & the fbi also see that this innocent child
> deutsche
> > kilr was just asking a silly question & has now probably felt
> > chastised & has left forever just like that dude from morocco who
> was
> > similarly misunderstood & discouraged from further participation
> >
> > & if you all will excuse my saying so
> > these young foolish & actually mobile people are some kinds of
> people
> > i for one would like to have more of at bp & in everyones land
> > not less of
>
> I do not think that anyone should regard drug smuggling
> as "innocent", not even questions about it. I do not see why we
> somebody like this on bp, I must admit.i like variety & have no problem with freedom or novelty
>are
> > I for one do not want
> > > to be complicit in illegal activity and obviously disapprove of
> any
> > > such activity.
> >
> > obviously you are not complicit in any of these dumb laws nor in
> > anything about them
> >
> > you are too smart for that anton
> > & i have to call you on it
> >
> > so dont give it another thought if you like
> >
> > & pivot your creative power into whatever you do appreciate
>
> Obviously, I will not go into discussions about whether drug laws
> sensible or not, so I will take up your suggestion and will notgive
> this another thought.in
>
> > > Thank you.
> >
> > the pleasure is mine
>
> Ditto.
> By the way - Mike, you yourself are very clever, too. Too clever,
> fact, for me to believe your not infrequent claims that you do notWhy
> understand various postings by different bp for lack of clarity.
> not be a bit more gracious, especially with those whose firsttruth
> language is not English?
>
> All the best & Merry Christmas,
>
> Anton
>
>
> PS: Btw, if, by calling yourself "aletheia kallos" you mean the
> phrase "beautiful truth" in Ancient Greek, may I correct your
> grammar? The spelling should be "aletheia kalle", as aletheia -
> is feminine, and the feminine first person singular of theadjective
> kallos is "kalle" (pronounced kuh-LAY).then i must graciously correct your correction