Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Fw: AFCNPK photo
Date: Oct 24, 2004 @ 21:48
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@image.dk>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----From: Jesper NielsenSent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:41 PMSubject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Fw: AFCNPK photoThe pass must be Chillinji Pass which is further west, and it may be AFPK marker 2.Jesper----- Original Message -----From: Michael KaufmanSent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:35 PMSubject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Fw: AFCNPK photoPerhaps it is not the real tripoint. I would think it
would be 1 (or a really high number) if it were. Any
agreements/treaties found?
--- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@image.dk> wrote:
>
>
> A visitor to Borderbase has just supplied me with
> this scan of AFCNPK.
>
> The place looks very remote
>
>
http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:8085/tajikistan/100k/10-43-102.jpg
> , but yet
> demarcated.
>
> But why the number 2?
>
> Jesper
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/jpeg name=Pak-Afg-Chi.jpg
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com