A further clue to the situation:
http://tinyurl.com/58l3j (a PDF file)
Peter
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
<smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> It might be even stranger: at the Vaud site, you can select "Plan
> d'ensemble" or "Donnees cadastrales". I think the Vaud territory is
> coloured, but the CH2BEFR boundary can be seen as entering the
Canal
> from the east and then proceeding through the Canal to the west, in
> between the middle line that is the CH2FRVD boundary and the north
> bank! This makes the Fribourg/Freiburg part of the Canal only one
> fifth or so of the width of the entire canal... Unfortunately, this
> map site doesn't show the situation on the west side of the area
that
> has our interest; it takes out a part north of the CH2FRVD boundary
> west of the CH2BEFRNE tripoint.
> Peter
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Arif Samad <fHoiberg@y...>
> wrote:
> (...)
> > I also have to agree with Peter, I think. I have
> > identified that situation in one other source besides
> > the Neuchatel site and I have yet to find a site that
> > overrules that though there are a lot less detailed
> > sites that keep the situation mysterious. Topo maps
> > are generally good about boundaries anyway. The only
> > thing is that the situation is very confusing there
> > and I have not found a large enough and detailed
> > enough map that connects the boundary lines for me
> > perfectly. The Vaud and Fribourg sites have 1:10000
> > maps, but I need a bigger map screen to figure it out
> > perfectly. I wish somebody had enough time to join
> > all the maps in all sites to connect it perfectly and
> > check it.
> > Arif
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com