this is too much jack
last time i would have made idmtwy if i had realized soon enough that you were the man to listen to there
but missed by 700 feet
this time i really do appreciate these data
for comparison at least
but i think i will be going again with my own also very careful measurements of the actual paper topo quad down to interpolated tenths of a millimeter
& careful hand calculations
i make them out to be
nad27
n lat 26deg 57min 31sec & 25hundredths &
w long 80deg 53min 09sec & 22hundredths
any tighter findings & actual data would obviously be appreciated
as we presently have only a best guessed square foot target within a 30 foot radius gps circle
& an extra problem is that the block to buoy mooring will have to be about 5 feet too long to keep the buoy afloat when normal water levels return
best wishes
m
>From: "Jack Parsell" >Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com >To: >Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] glhemaokpa coordinates >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:43:44 -0500 > >Just happen to have them handy. >N26d 57m 32s W80d 53m 08s by Delorme >N26d 57m 31s W80d 53m 07s by Topozone >Hope you both have a great time finding it. >Jack > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Hanrahan [mailto:hanrahan@...] > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 9:30 PM > To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] glhemaokpa coordinates > > > Mick, it just occured to me that I don't have the coordinates for > glhemaokpa, and I can't seem to lay my hands on the appropriate quad > (which I know I have somewhere!). Do you have the quad, or have you > already computed the coordinates of the quintipoint? I want to be > sure I have the coordinates in my GPS on Saturday... > > Hope you've been having fun in the Keys...and staying one step ahead > of the jailer. > > Bill > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > > > >