Is the boundary marker you saw the same one that appears in the referenced
photo? The tall white post in the circular gravel clearing at the tree line,
at the south end of the old landing strip? If so, then the web site author
is incorrect. (He's the internet millionaire who was sued by Barbra
Streisand because his web site shows her house in Malibu -- she lost).

-----Original Message-----
From: m06079 [mailto:barbaria_longa@...]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 3:53 PM
To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: MXPCUS CAPCOR

this beach location & monument 212 nearby
at an elevation of probably 41 feet above sea level
were visited by jc & me & reported in real time in message 2806

the actual tripoint in that vicinity is caorus
but it is more than 3nm seaward from the beach
& invisible in the fog on all 3 occasions when i tried

& i dont remember the house

or rather
i do seem to recall that there was no house visible from
anywhere along the direct line between the marker & the beach

& there is no marker on the beach other than the flimsy plastic
post mentioned

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Flynn, Kevin"
<flynnk@r...> wrote:

> I guess that would mark the state boundary, but it might not be

visible in

> the californiacoastline.org photo. The topo doesn't show the

house in the

> photo. It might be that the web site author is incorrect and the

crease in

> the trees is not the state line; I can't determine from the maps

and photos.

> It does look like the white monument in the photo is at the end

of the old

> airstrip, which would be very close to the state line.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Nielsen [mailto:jesniel@i...]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 2:13 PM
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] MXPCUS CAPCOR
>
>
> And BM 41?
>
> http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=10
>

<http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=10&n=4650308.0001242
3&e=399604.999999353&

> datum=nad83>

&n=4650308.00012423&e=399604.999999353&datum=nad83

>
> Jesper
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Flynn, Kevin <mailto:flynnk@r...>
> To: 'BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com'

<mailto:'BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com'>

>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:58 PM
> Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] MXPCUS CAPCOR
>
> Re: stone on beach at presumed CAOR, probably not. The site

creator claims

> the CAOR boundary is denoted by the crease in the trees to the

right of the

> house in this photo. In other words, the house is presumably

in Oregon.

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Nielsen [mailto:jesniel@i...]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:48 PM
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com

<mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>

> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] MXPCUS CAPCOR
>
>
> PC = Patific Ocean
>
> Nice areal shot of MXUS-PAcific Ocean at:
>
>

<http://www.californiacoastline.org/cgi-bin/image.cgi?image=10
108&mode=seque

> ntial&flags=0>
>

http://www.californiacoastline.org/cgi-bin/image.cgi?image=101
08&mode=sequen

> tial&flags=0
>
>
> But where is the Californian-Oregon border exactly?
>

http://www.californiacoastline.org/cgi-bin/maplocate.cgi?0,234,0,
468,0,42.00

> 4000,124.221167,360,225,148,260
>

<http://www.californiacoastline.org/cgi-bin/maplocate.cgi?0,234,
0,468,0,42.0

> 04000,124.221167,360,225,148,260>
> Is the stone by the tree line on the beach a boundary marker?
>
> Jesper
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/>
>
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>

<mailto:BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subjec
t=Unsubscribe>

>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service

> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

Yahoo! Groups Links