Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] "Condo" Lux-Ger proved to be correct!!!
Date: Jan 09, 2001 @ 16:45
Author: michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


thank you my lord

we are all proud i think of these twin confirmations
of dipunctitrilines at both bedelu & defrlu

& also of the new hint you bring of the likely co uniqueness in the world
of this phenomenon
since both instances are specific to this single treaty

m


> Hello, after studying pages after pages of official documents
>concerning this border I proudly report this: Yes, since 1816 - the year
>of the first written agreement on the boundary line between the Kingdoms
>of the Netherlands and Prussia - all water bodies forming the boundary
>lines between these 2 countries are to be considered as "condominiums"
>... many attempts have been made in the meantime, however, to change the
>status of the boundary line, untill today with no result. The latest
>agreement between Lux&Ger was signed in 1984 and contained no adjustment
>regarding the river boundaries.... So, I think we can now establish this
>as a fact: The Ger-Lux boundary line, mostly consisting of rivers like
>Mosel, Sauer and Our are in the possession of both states... Kind regards
>Peter eGroups Sponsor
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=149861.1280212.2876301.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700126166:N/A=47
>3696/?http://www.newaydirect.com target="_top">
>* * * BoundaryPoint shortcuts * * *
>Post new message: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
>Subscribe: BoundaryPoint-subscribe@egroups.com
>Unsubscribe: BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>List owner: BoundaryPoint-owner@egroups.com
>URL to main page: <http://www.egroups.com/group/BoundaryPoint>
>http://www.egroups.com/group/BoundaryPoint
>