Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Hancok, MD
Date: Jun 09, 2003 @ 02:52
Author: Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> ----------My error, it wasn't Spruce bur rather South Street, then known as Cedar
> From: acroorca2002[SMTP:orc@...]
> Reply To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:02 PM
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Hancok, MD
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Flynn, Kevin"
> <flynnk@r...> wrote:
> > A very interesting what-if regarding this narrow neck of MD:
> >
> > Before Mason and Dixon set out on their survey, Lord
> Baltimore's
> > representatives believed the PA-MD line of latitude would be
> farther north.
> > Once it was established as a line 15 mi (IIRC) south of Spruce
> Street in
> > Philadelphia
>
> you probably do recall correctly
> as it was to be 15 miles south of the southernmost point of
> philadelphia at that time
> but how did you arrive at spruce street for it
> & what part of spruce street if you can say
>
>
> > (minus the land enclosed by the New Castle arc, of course),However, I wonder whether Virginia would have interceded and actually
> > there was a real concern that the MD-VA line (the right bank of
> the Potomac)
> > might actually swing so far north that it would extend north of
> the MD-PA
> > boundary. Now *that* would have been interesting.
> >
> > So what is the speculation here as to how that situation might
> have been
> > equitably resolved among VA-MD-PA?
>
> it might have been equitably resolved the same way kymotn was
> resolved
> which was for the surveyors to just follow the agreed specs
> whatever happened
> thus producing in that case the kentucky bend exclave
> & in our speculation a similarly detached western md exclave
> as you anticipate below
>
> > VA was supposed to have the lands south
> > of the Potomac; but if the river flowed north of 44 deg latitude,
>
> actually if the river flowed anywhere north of the latitude agreed in
> 1760 as you describe it above
> or in other words mason & dixons 39d43m17s6
> aka mdn of today
> for example 39d43m15s521 nad27 at mdne
> then it would have done as you say here below
>
> > it would
> > have punctured PA and cut off eastern MD from western MD,
> creating a large
> > enclave. How else could this have been resolved?
>
> i suppose a particularly generous & whimsical pa mightve given
> to md the part of itself that wouldve fallen south of the potomac
> & thus produce a sausage chain of 3 mary lands
> connected only by 2 mdmdpava tristate quadripoints
>
>Yes. Page 133, "Drawing the Line: How Mason and Dixon Surveyed the
> > As noted here, Mason and Dixon breathed a sigh of relief when
> the river's
> > course again turned to the south before reaching their line.
>
> interesting
> can you give the source of this sigh
>
>